SEC Staff Revises its FAQs on Internal Control Reporting; Adds 4 New FAQs for Foreign Private Issuers
October 3, 2007
October 3, 2007
On September 24, 2007, the SEC Staff revised its frequently asked questions (FAQs) on Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR).
The SEC staff eliminated 12 prior FAQs it believed were no longer relevant or necessary, or that were addressed by the SEC’s recent issuance of interpretive guidance on management ICFR reports.
The SEC staff also added four new FAQs pertaining to foreign private issuers (FPIs):
Scope of ICFR Evaluation Should be Based on Primary Financial Statements (New FAQ 12). Management of an FPI that files home country accounts with a US GAAP reconciliation should plan and scope its ICFR evaluation based on the primary financial statements (i.e., home country GAAP). However, the evaluation should consider controls related to the preparation of the US GAAP reconciliation.
Reference to “Interim Financial Statements” in Material Weakness Definition Does Not Apply to FPIs (New FAQ 13). Since home country requirements vary significantly and there are no uniform requirements requiring FPIs to file periodic interim financial statements, the reference to “interim financial statements” in the definition of material weakness does not apply to FPIs (unless they are filing on domestic forms).
Treatment of Entities for ICFR Evaluation Purposes Should Track Treatment in Primary Financial Statements (New FAQ 14). If an entity is treated differently under primary GAAP (i.e., home country GAAP) than it is in the US GAAP reconciliation (e.g., consolidated in the home country accounts but equity method under US GAAP), the ICFR evaluation should be based on how the entity is treated in the primary financial statements.
Scope Limitation Permitted for Certain Proportionately Consolidated Entities (New FAQ 15). Some FPIs are required under home country GAAP to account for certain entities on a proportionate consolidation basis. Management’s ICFR report ordinarily should include all consolidated entities, even if they are consolidated on a proportionate basis. However, in cases where the company does not have the right or authority to evaluate internal controls of the proportionately consolidated entity and lacks the access necessary in practice to make that evaluation, the proportionately consolidated entity’s internal controls may be excluded from the scope of management’s assessment. (Management must still evaluate controls over the recording of amounts relating to the proportionately consolidated entity in the company’s consolidated financial statements). The FAQ specifies certain disclosure that must be provided regarding the exclusion of the internal controls of these entities from the scope of the ICFR assessment.
The remaining FAQs are substantially the same and have been renumbered as a result of the elimination of the 12 old FAQs.
* * *
A pdf of the new FAQs is included, together with a blackline that shows the changes from the prior version of the FAQs. The new FAQs can be accessed at the following link: http://www.sec.gov/info/accountants/controlfaq.htm
* * *
Please feel free to contact any of your regular contacts at the firm or any of our partners and counsel listed under “Capital Markets” or “Corporate Governance” in the “Our Practice” section of this website (www.clearygottlieb.com) if you have any questions.
Blackline of New 404 FAQs vs Old FAQs
New SEC Internal Control FAQs (September 24, 2007)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP