PIPEs
September 20, 2007
“Berlacher knew or was reckless in not knowing that the lawful way to cover those short positions that were established to ’hedge’ PIPE investments was to purchase open market shares, but he chose instead to cover his pre-effective date short positions with PIPE shares in order to avoid exposing the trades to market risk.”
As in some of the earlier PIPEs proceedings, in Berlacher the defendants are alleged to have “engaged in deceptive trading techniques -- i.e., wash sales, matched orders and pre-arranged trades -- to create the false appearance that the PIPE shares being used to cover the short positions were market shares” (Complaint ¶32). Although the Complaint does not contrast these deceptive trading techniques with what the SEC would describe as lawful covering purchases in the open market, it is fair to say that each of the deceptive trading techniques described in the Complaint has the common element of eliminating any market risk between the defendants’ sale of registered shares and their purported separate purchase of the same number of shares in the open market.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20278.htm
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2007/comp20278.pdf
Please feel free to contact any of your regular contacts at the firm or any of our partners and counsel listed under Capital Markets in the “Our Practice” section of this website if you have any questions.
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP